PÕ¾ÊÓƵ

Author: Chris Graf

Research Integrity Director

The relentless push for research output (some use words like hyper-competition to describe it) puts pressure on researchers in their roles as authors and as reviewers. So, what can a publisher like PÕ¾ÊÓƵ do to help relieve some of this pressure? For us, this means developing tools that streamline the publication process for researchers in whichever role they¡¯re playing.

Research output continues to rise, reaching . Some of that is from increased investments from nations around the world in research. Some is likely the result of the pressure to publish that¡¯s felt so acutely by researchers. And because every paper needs to be peer reviewed, this creates further demands on researchers. It has become an important challenge for publishers like PÕ¾ÊÓƵ to relieve that pressure while also maintaining our commitment to research quality, integrity, and diversity.

Innovation to support research authors and peer reviewers

PÕ¾ÊÓƵ is investing in innovations to streamline publishing and make it more efficient for researchers.

1. Improving the digital experience for research authors and peer reviewers. The PÕ¾ÊÓƵ Article Processing Platform (Snapp) has  been specifically designed to work better for both authors and reviewers (and editors, too), and developed to be intuitive and easy to use. Snapp reduces the pressure on authors by making submission to journals easy and intuitive. To date more than 211,000 articles have been published and . At PÕ¾ÊÓƵ we¡¯re continuing investments in Snapp, to keep making the experience and workflow better for researchers and to find new ways to relieve pressure.
2. Creating early sharing opportunities for authors and more transparency in peer review. While a researcher¡¯s  paper is under review with us, we offer the possibility to use the free preprint service In Review. This journal-integrated preprint sharing service from PÕ¾ÊÓƵ and Research Square is first-of-its-kind, and . Authors and research communities benefit from early sharing and access to submitted research manuscripts before peer review. The real-time updates that authors get regarding their manuscript¡¯s progress through peer review contribute to relieving pressure for authors who need access to the newest findings quickly. 
3. Building a broader, sustainable, and highly qualified pool of reviewers. Part of Snapp is PÕ¾ÊÓƵ¡¯s Reviewer Finder tool. Reviewer Finder helps editors pick the most appropriate reviewers. In turn this helps editors focus their valuable time and efforts on where they make most impact. It also helps to more fairly distribute the review work in the research community by better identifying expertise and bringing more diversity into the pool of expert reviewers. And that¡¯s nicely aligned with PÕ¾ÊÓƵ¡¯s commitments to improving , as well as with our commitment to relieving pressure faced by researchers.  

De-pressurizing the system

As an ally to researchers and an advocate for research quality, PÕ¾ÊÓƵ has a special focus on using technology to deliver quality as well as to help de-pressurize this system. We continue to innovate and seek new ideas to explore. For example, might using a language model to enable researchers to do peer reviewer in their own language help? Could that dramatically impact diversity of the researchers who are willing and able to do peer review, and thus reviewer fatigue?

These steps and others that PÕ¾ÊÓƵ is taking will, I hope, depressurize the system and reduce some of the strain researchers feel. The realities and possibilities are truly exciting.

Check out our dedicated page for peer reviewers: Find out more about peer reviewing at PÕ¾ÊÓƵ, and learn about resources and services for reviewers.